Performance Measurement Framework for Agile Scrum Software Engineering Environment
Keywords:
Agile Scrum, Performance Management, Software Metrics, Software Engineering EnvironmentAbstract
Performance of individual developers and effort on reworks in agile scrum environments has an impact on the productivity and quality of the developed software. The traditional agile metrics do not consider reworks in measuring productivity. Yet, an enhanced methodology to compute individual performance and quantify reworks in agile scrum contexts is required. By introducing Earned Value Analysis based Productivity Ratio and Blended Quality Metric based on Code Maintainability Index, this gap is bridged. Applying the metrics to ten real time software projects over eighteen months, having twelve sprints each, a framework is decided for performance management in agile scrum development. The findings indicate the efficacy of the metrics in providing valuable insights to improve productivity and quality measures in software development environments.
Downloads
References
Individual performance in the Scrum environment. (2017, November 7). Individual performance in Scrum environment. Online Forum Post.
https://www.scrum.org/forum/scrum-forum/13381/individual-performance-scrum-enviornment
Rubin, K. S.. (2012). Essential Scrum: A Practical Guide to the Most Popular Agile Process.
Ahmed, A, Tayyab, M, Bhatti, S, Alzahrani, A, & Babar, M (2017). Impact of story point estimation on product using metrics in scrum development process. 8(4), 385–391.
Hayes, W, Miller, S, Lapham, M. A., Wrubel, E, & Chick, T (2014). Agile Metrics: Progress Monitoring of Agile Contractors.
Dixit, R, & Bhushan, B Scrum: An Agile Software Development Process and Metrics. 7(1), 73–87.
Almeida, F, & Carneiro, P (2023). Perceived Importance of Metrics for Agile Scrum Environments. 14, 327. https://doi.org/10.3390/info14060327
Almeida, F, & Carneiro, P (2021). Performance metrics in scrum software engineering companies. 14(327). https://doi.org/10.3390/info14060327
Mahnic, V, & Zabkar, N (2012). Measuring progress of scrum-based software projects. 18(8), 73–76
Ifra, I. and Bajwa, J. (2016) ‘Metrics of scrum methodology’, International Journal of Computer Applications, Vol. 149, No. 2, pp.24–27.
Bitla, K. S, & Veesamsetty, S. S (2019). Measuring Process Flow using Metrics in Agile Software Development A Systematic Literature Review and a Case Study.
Tripp, J., Riemenschneider, C. and Thatcher, J. (2016) ‘Job satisfaction in agile development teams: agile development as work redesign’, Journal of the Association for Information Systems, Vol. 17, No. 4, pp.267–307.
Tanner, M. and Mackinnon, A. (2015) ‘Sources of interruptions experienced during a scrum sprint’, The Electronic Journal of Information Systems Evaluation, Vol. 18, No. 1, pp.3–18.
Kupiainen, E, Mäntyla, M, Mika, V. and Itkonen, J. (2015) ‘Using metrics in agile and lean software development – A systematic literature review of industrial studies’, Information and Software Technology, Vol. 62, pp.143–163
Eduard Budacu (2018) Real Time Agile Metrics for Measuring Team Performance. Informatica Economica
Cabri, A, & Griffiths, M. (2006). Earned value and agile reporting. In AGILE 2006 (pp. 10-pp). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/AGILE.2006.21
Agarwal, M., & Majumdar, R.. (2012). Tracking scrum projects tools, metrics and myths about agile. 2(3), 97–104.
Alegria, J., Bastarrica, M. C., & Bergel, A.. (2011). Is it safe to adopt the scrum process model?. 14(3), 1–11.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
All papers should be submitted electronically. All submitted manuscripts must be original work that is not under submission at another journal or under consideration for publication in another form, such as a monograph or chapter of a book. Authors of submitted papers are obligated not to submit their paper for publication elsewhere until an editorial decision is rendered on their submission. Further, authors of accepted papers are prohibited from publishing the results in other publications that appear before the paper is published in the Journal unless they receive approval for doing so from the Editor-In-Chief.
IJISAE open access articles are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. This license lets the audience to give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made and if they remix, transform, or build upon the material, they must distribute contributions under the same license as the original.