Comparison of the Optimum Barrier Properties of PET/PE and BOPP/CPP Laminate Structures

Authors

  • Suman Kumari, Sandeep Boora

Keywords:

EVOH, BOPP/CPP, laminate, intramolecular, suitability

Abstract

In this study the barrier properties of two different laminate structures are investigated which are typically used in food packaging industry: PET/PE (Polyethylene Terephthalate/Polyethylene) and BOPP/CPP (Biaxially Oriented Polypropylene/Cast Polypropylene). The objective of this was to check if a structure based on BOPP could serve as a feasible alternative to the standard and traditional PET-based structure, while offering potential similar advantages in terms of barrier requirements. For this Water Vapor Transmission Rate and Oxygen Transmission Rate were measured using MOCON PERMATRAN-W® Model 3/34 G and MOCON OX-TRON 2/21 respectively. As we know BOPP ( WVTR -1.5–5.9 g/m2/24hrs for 100µm film) has a good barrier to water vapor as compared to PET (WVTR - 3.9–17g/ m2/24hrs for 100µm film) and BOPP( OTR - 93–300 cc/m2/24hrs for 100µm film) has low gas barrier as compared to PET (OTR - 1.8–7.7 cc/m2/24hrs for 100µm film), thus a coating of EVOH (Ethylene-vinyl alcohol) is added to the BOPP film in order to improve the oxygen barrier properties of BOPP/CPP based laminate. The EVOH has polar hydroxyl groups present in vinyl alcohol which cause strong inter-and intramolecular bonding and which results in good gas barrier properties of EVOH. The final results of test performed on two laminates demonstrated that the BOPP/CPP laminate showed superior barrier properties compared to the PET/PE laminate which suggests that BOPP/CPP laminates can be used as an appropriate alternative to PET/PE structures for food packaging applications such as bakery items or snacks item. Further research could look into the suitability of each laminate structure for different food products based on the barrier requirements.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdellatief, A., & Welt, B. A. (2012b). Comparison of New Dynamic Accumulation Method for Measuring Oxygen Transmission Rate of Packaging against the Steady‐State Method Described by ASTM D3985. Packaging Technology & Science/Packaging Technology and Science, 26(5), 281–288. https://doi.org/10.1002/pts.1974

Banerjee, R., & Ray, S. S. (2022). Sustainability and Life Cycle Assessment of Thermoplastic Polymers for Packaging: A Review on Fundamental Principles and Applications. Macromolecular Materials and Engineering, 307(6), 2100794.

Larsen, H., & Liland, K. H. (2013). Determination of O2 And CO2 Transmission Rate of Whole Packages and Single Perforations in Micro-Perforated Packages for Fruit and Vegetables. Journal of Food Engineering, 119(2), 271-276.

Lazić, V., Budinski-Simendić, J., Gvozdenović, J. J. B. S., & Simendić, B. (2010). Barrier Properties of Coated and Laminated Polyolefin Films for Food Packaging. Acta Physica Polonica A, 117(5), 855-858.

Lu, Q., & Zheng, F. (2018). Polyimides for Electronic Applications. In Elsevier eBooks (pp. 195–255). https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-812640-0.00005-6

Mokwena, K. K., & Tang, J. (2012). Ethylene Vinyl Alcohol: A Review of Barrier Properties for Packaging Shelf Stable Foods. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 52(7), 640-650.

Nakano, Y., Yanase, T., Nagahama, T., Yoshida, H., & Shimada, T. (2016). Accurate and Stable Equal-Pressure Measurements of Water Vapor Transmission Rate Reaching the 10−6 G M−2 Day−1 Range. Scientific Reports, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep35408

Pan, Z., Bora, M., Gee, R., & Dauskardt, R. H. (2023). Water Vapor Transmission Rate Measurement for Moisture Barriers Using Infrared Imaging. Materials Chemistry and Physics, 308, 128289.

Robertson, G. L. (2009). Food Packaging and Shelf Life: A Practical Guide. CRC Press.

Sarkar, S., & Aparna, K. (2020). Food Packaging and Storage. Research Trends in Home Science and Extension AkiNik Pub, 3, 27-51.

Shaharuzaman, M. A., Sapuan, S. M., & Mansor, M. R. (2021). Sustainable Materials Selection: Principles and Applications. In Design for Sustainability (pp. 57-84). Elsevier.

Tyagi, P., Salem, K. S., Hubbe, M. A., & Pal, L. (2021). Advances in Barrier Coatings and Film Technologies for Achieving Sustainable Packaging of Food Products–A Review. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 115, 461-485.

Unwrapping the Benefits of BOPP Films: Sustainability and Versatility | Cosmo Films. (n.d.). Cosmo Films. https://www.cosmofilms.com/blog/benefits-of-bopp-films

Vasile, C., & Baican, M. (2021). Progresses in Food Packaging, Food Quality, and Safety—Controlled-Release antioxidant and/or Antimicrobial Packaging. Molecules/Molecules Online/Molecules Annual, 26(5), 1263. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26051263

Downloads

Published

09.07.2024

How to Cite

Suman Kumari. (2024). Comparison of the Optimum Barrier Properties of PET/PE and BOPP/CPP Laminate Structures. International Journal of Intelligent Systems and Applications in Engineering, 12(22s), 1498 –. Retrieved from https://www.ijisae.org/index.php/IJISAE/article/view/6672

Issue

Section

Research Article