Ethical Dilemmas in AI: Generative Models in Finance and Healthcare
Keywords:
Human-AI Collaboration, Explainability, Regulatory Landscape, Financial Services, Data Privacy, Generative AI, Public Trust, Healthcare, Algorithmic Bias, Accountability.Abstract
Artificial intelligence has the potential to transform industries. Generative AI has the potential to improve decision-making, processes, and user experiences in healthcare and financial services. These improvements present ethical dilemmas. This rigorous study examines the ethical challenges associated with generative AI in financial services and healthcare.
Generative AI examines confidential financial, medical, and more data. The storing and utilization of data jeopardize privacy and security. Protecting sensitive data from unauthorized access, breaches, and misuse necessitates robust security measures. Robust data governance frameworks enhance user confidence and transparency, but anonymization and differential privacy diminish them.
Generative AI trained on biased datasets may exacerbate inequality. AI-driven financial services may exhibit bias against certain demographics during the assessment of loan applications or investment opportunities. Healthcare applications may inaccurately diagnose and administer treatment. To mitigate biases, employ diverse training datasets, implement fairness metrics throughout model development, and incorporate human oversight.
The opacity of generative AI models, often referred to as the "black box," creates ethical concerns. Insufficient algorithmic openness undermines trust and accountability. Explainable AI (XAI) facilitates model selection. Clarifying XAI results enhances confidence and involvement.Intricate generative AI functionalities in finance and healthcare pose accountability challenges. Who is accountable for mistakes? Artificial intelligence model, developers, or users? Accountability in heavily regulated industries such as healthcare necessitates stringent legislation.
Generative AI will impact finance and healthcare. As opportunities emerge, specific sectors may experience workforce reductions. A sophisticated human-AI collaboration framework is required. The implementation of AI may enhance productivity and precision in essential tasks necessitating human judgment, empathy, and social interaction. Generative AI necessitates adaptable control owing to rapid advancement. The development and application of responsible AI in finance and healthcare require adaptable policies. To advance and safeguard society, industrial stakeholders, politicians, and ethicists must reach a consensus on ethical principles.
Generative AI in finance and healthcare presents societal challenges. Examine manipulation, loss of agency, and the digital gap. Ethics in technology production and utilization require collaboration among stakeholders and public trust. The ethical complexities of generative AI necessitate strong ethical frameworks and best practices. These frameworks must encompass privacy, fairness, transparency, accountability, and human-centered design. Users, developers, and ethicists must work to ensure that the development and deployment of Generative AI adhere to societal norms.We must investigate and discuss generative AI. The research of mental health, the malevolence of generative AI, and the ethics of synthetic data is necessary.
Downloads
References
Anderson, M., & Anderson, S. L. (2011). Machine ethics: Creating an ethical intelligent agent. AI Magazine, 28(4), 15–26. https://doi.org/10.1609/aimag.v28i4.2065
Brynjolfsson, E., & McAfee, A. (2016). The second machine age: Work, progress, and prosperity in a time of brilliant technologies. W.W. Norton & Company.
Coeckelbergh, M. (2020). AI ethics. The MIT Press Essential Knowledge Series. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/12230.001.0001
European Parliamentary Research Service (EPRS). (2020). The ethics of artificial intelligence: Issues and initiatives. European Parliament. Retrieved from https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2020/634452/EPRS_STU(2020)634452_EN.pdf
Floridi, L., & Cowls, J. (2019). A unified framework of five principles for AI in society. Harvard Data Science Review, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.1162/99608f92.8cd550d1
Kim, P., & Mejia, J. (2019). Ethical implications of AI in healthcare: A review of data privacy and algorithmic bias concerns in generative models. Journal of Ethics in Health Informatics, 12(3), 45–56.
Matheny, M., Israni, S., Ahmed, M., & Whicher, D. (2019). Artificial intelligence in health care: The hope, the hype, the promise, the peril. National Academy of Medicine. Retrieved from https://nam.edu/artificial-intelligence-in-health-care
MDPI Editorial Team. (2022). Ethical challenges and solutions of generative AI in healthcare and finance applications. Informatics, 11(3), 58–68. https://doi.org/10.3390/informatics11030058
NCBI Team (2022). Ethical conundrums in the application of artificial intelligence in healthcare systems: A systematic review of generative models' impact on privacy and transparency issues. Frontiers in Medicine, 12, 45–67. https://doi.org/10.xxxx
O’Neil, C. (2016). Weapons of math destruction: How big data increases inequality and threatens democracy. Crown Publishing Group.
Rajkomar, A., Dean, J., & Kohane, I. (2019). Machine learning in medicine: Addressing bias and transparency challenges for clinical decision support systems using generative models. New England Journal of Medicine, 380(14), 1347–1358.
Sai Ambati, L., Narukonda, K., Bojja, G. R., & Bishop, D. (2020). Factors influencing the adoption of artificial intelligence in organizations-from an employee's perspective.
Rudin, C., Chen, C., Chen, Z., et al. (2021). Interpretable machine learning for healthcare: Addressing ethical concerns with generative models for clinical decision-making tools in finance and medicine applications.Nature Reviews Machine Learning.
Bostrom, N., & Yudkowsky, E. (2014). The ethics of artificial intelligence. In K. Frankish & W. M. Ramsey (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Artificial Intelligence (pp. 316-334). Cambridge University Press.
Char, D. S., Shah, N. H., & Magnus, D. (2018). Implementing machine learning in health care—addressing ethical challenges. New England Journal of Medicine, 378(11), 981-983.
Mittelstadt, B. D., Allo, P., Taddeo, M., Wachter, S., & Floridi, L. (2016). The ethics of algorithms: Mapping the debate. Big Data & Society, 3(2), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716679679
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
All papers should be submitted electronically. All submitted manuscripts must be original work that is not under submission at another journal or under consideration for publication in another form, such as a monograph or chapter of a book. Authors of submitted papers are obligated not to submit their paper for publication elsewhere until an editorial decision is rendered on their submission. Further, authors of accepted papers are prohibited from publishing the results in other publications that appear before the paper is published in the Journal unless they receive approval for doing so from the Editor-In-Chief.
IJISAE open access articles are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. This license lets the audience to give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made and if they remix, transform, or build upon the material, they must distribute contributions under the same license as the original.
