Counterfactual Forecasting of Human Behavior using Generative AI and Causal Graphs
Keywords:
Counterfactual Inference · Generative AI · Structural Causal Models · Causal Graphs.Abstract
This study presents a novel framework for counterfactual user behavior forecasting that combines structural causal models with transformer-based generative artificial intelligence. To model fictitious situations, the method creates causal graphs that map the connections between user interactions, adoption metrics, and product features. The framework generates realistic behavioral trajectories under counterfactual conditions by using generative models that are conditioned on causal variables. Tested on datasets from web interactions, mobile applications, and e-commerce, the methodology outperforms conventional forecasting and uplift modeling techniques. Product teams can effectively simulate and assess possible interventions prior to deployment thanks to the framework’s improved interpretability through causal path visualization. With important ramifications f or developing product strategies and improving A/B testing, this study uses generative modeling techniques to bridge the gap between predictive analytics and causal inference.
Downloads
References
J. Pearl and D. Mackenzie, “The Book of Why: The New Science of Cause and Effect,” Basic Books, 2018.
S. Athey and G. W. Imbens, “The state of applied econometrics: Causality and policy evaluation,” Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 3-32, 2017.
A. Datta, M. C. Tschantz, and A. Datta, “Automated experiments on ad privacy settings,” Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies, vol. 2015, no. 1, pp. 92-112, 2015.
F. Morichetta, M. Trevisan, and L. Vassio, “Characterizing user behavior in mobile apps: The case of digital wellbeing apps,” IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 952-965, 2021.
J. Pearl, “Causality: Models, Reasoning, and Inference,” Cambridge University Press, 2nd edition, 2009.
E. Sharma, J. Hofman, and D. Watts, “Estimating the causal impact of recommen- dation systems from observational data,” Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Economics and Computation, pp. 453-470, 2015.
S. Wager and S. Athey, “Estimation and inference of heterogeneous treatment effects using random forests,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, vol. 113, no. 523, pp. 1228-1242, 2018.
S. Verma, J. Dickerson, and K. Hines, “Counterfactual explanations for machine learning: A review,” arXiv:2010.10596, 2020.
L. Bottou, J. Peters, et. al. “Counterfactual reasoning and learning systems: The example of computational advertising,” Journal of Machine Learning Research, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 3207-3260, 2013.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
All papers should be submitted electronically. All submitted manuscripts must be original work that is not under submission at another journal or under consideration for publication in another form, such as a monograph or chapter of a book. Authors of submitted papers are obligated not to submit their paper for publication elsewhere until an editorial decision is rendered on their submission. Further, authors of accepted papers are prohibited from publishing the results in other publications that appear before the paper is published in the Journal unless they receive approval for doing so from the Editor-In-Chief.
IJISAE open access articles are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. This license lets the audience to give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made and if they remix, transform, or build upon the material, they must distribute contributions under the same license as the original.