Modern Approaches in SHM: Combining AI, UAVs, and 3D Printing for Bridge Monitoring

Authors

  • Ravindra B. Shendge, Kale Laxmi Nana

Keywords:

Smart Cities; Structural Health Monitoring (SHM); Bridge Infrastructure; Internet of Things (IoT); Artificial Intelligence (AI); Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs); 3D Printing Technology.

Abstract

The challenges of urban management grow as towns, vehicles, and people increase. Making cities smarter is one of the most effective strategies for overcoming urban problems. Today's "smart cities" are distinguished by the use of cutting-edge technology in their infrastructure and services. Smart cities make the most effective use of their resources through meticulous preparation. Smart cities provide their residents with more and better services by lowering costs and upgrading infrastructure. One of the vital municipal services that can be extremely beneficial in municipal administration is structural health monitoring (SHM). Essential urban infrastructure can last longer and operate more effectively by combining cutting-edge new technologies like the Internet of Things (IoT) with structural health monitoring. As a result, a thorough assessment of the latest developments in infrastructure SHM is essential. The construction, upkeep, and development of bridges are among the most important aspects of urban management, and they are one of the essential components of a city's infrastructure. The main goal of this study is to examine how artificial intelligence (AI) and certain technologies, such 3D printers and drone technology, may be used to improve the current state of bridge SHM systems, including conceptual frameworks, advantages and disadvantages, and existing methods. The future role of AI and other technologies in bridge SHM systems was covered in this study. In addition, a few cutting-edge research prospects that are made possible by technology are highlighted, discussed, and described.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Al Nuaimi, E.; Al Neyadi, H.; Mohamed, N.; Al-Jaroodi, J. Applications of big data to smart cities. J. Internet Serv. Appl. 2015, 6, 25. [CrossRef]

Ahvenniemi, H.; Huovila, A.; Pinto-Seppä, I.; Airaksinen, M. What are the differences between sustainable and smart cities? Cities 2017, 60, 234–245. [CrossRef]

Silva, B.N.; Khan, M.; Han, K. Towards sustainable smart cities: A review of trends, architectures, components, and open challenges in smart cities. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2018, 38, 697–713. [CrossRef]

Prus, P.; Sikora, M. The impact of transport infrastructure on the sustainable development of the region—Case study. Agriculture 2021, 11, 279. [CrossRef]

Razmjoo, A.; Østergaard, P.A.; Denai, M.; Nezhad, M.M.; Mirjalili, S. Effective policies to overcome barriers in the development of smart cities. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 2021, 79, 102175. [CrossRef]

Guido, G.; Haghshenas, S.S.; Vitale, A.; Astarita, V. Challenges and Opportunities of Using Data Fusion Methods for Travel Time Estimation. In Proceedings of the 2022 8th International Conference on Control, Decision and Information Technologies (CoDIT), Istanbul, Turkey, 17–20 May 2022; IEEE: Manhattan, NY, USA, 2022; Volume 1, pp. 587–592.

Guido, G.; Haghshenas, S.S.; Haghshenas, S.S.; Vitale, A.; Gallelli, V.; Astarita, V. Prioritizing the Potential Smartification Measures by Using an Integrated Decision Support System with Sustainable Development Goals (a Case Study in Southern Italy). Safety 2022, 8, 35. [CrossRef]

Estes, A.C.; Frangopol, D.M. Bridge lifetime system reliability under multiple limit states. J. Bridge Eng. 2001, 6, 523–528.[CrossRef]

Schulz, A.; Zia, A.; Koliba, C. Adapting bridge infrastructure to climate change: Institutionalizing resilience in intergovernmental transportation planning processes in the Northeastern USA. Mitig. Adapt. Strateg. Glob. Chang. 2017, 22, 175–198. [CrossRef]

Casas, J.R.; Moughty, J.J. Bridge damage detection based on vibration data: Past and new developments. Front. Built Environ.2017, 3, 4. [CrossRef]

Jeong, Y.; Kim, W.; Lee, I.; Lee, J. Bridge inspection practices and bridge management programs in China, Japan, Korea, and US. J. Struct. Integr. Maint. 2018, 3, 126–135.

Liu, L.; Frangopol, D.M.; Mondoro, A.; Yang, D.Y. Sustainability-informed bridge ranking under scour based on transportation network performance and multiattribute utility. J. Bridge Eng. 2018, 23, 04018082. [CrossRef]

Kaewunruen, S.; Sresakoolchai, J.; Zhou, Z. Sustainability-based lifecycle management for bridge infrastructure using 6D BIM.Sustainability 2020, 12, 2436. [CrossRef]

Artese, S.; Zinno, R. TLS for dynamic measurement of the elastic line of bridges. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 1182. [CrossRef]

Zinno, R.; Artese, S. Innovative methods and materials in structural health monitoring of civil infrastructures. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 1140. [CrossRef]

Ranyal, E.; Sadhu, A.; Jain, K. Road condition monitoring using smart sensing and artificial intelligence: A review. Sensors 2022, 22, 3044. [CrossRef]

Sony, S.; Dunphy, K.; Sadhu, A.; Capretz, M. A systematic review of convolutional neural network-based structural condition assessment techniques. Eng. Struct. 2021, 226, 111347. [CrossRef]

Moughty, J.J.; Casas, J.R. A state-of-the-art review of modal-based damage detection in bridges: Development, challenges, and solutions. Appl. Sci. 2017, 7, 510. [CrossRef]

Song, G.; Wang, C.; Wang, B. Structural health monitoring (SHM) of civil structures. Appl. Sci. 2017, 7, 789. [CrossRef]

Altunıs¸ık, A.C.; Okur, F.Y.; Karaca, S.; Kahya, V. Vibration-based damage detection in beam structures with multiple cracks: Modal curvature vs. modal flexibility methods. Nondestruct. Test. Evaluat. 2019, 34, 33–53. [CrossRef]

Vardanega, P.J.; Webb, G.T.; Fidler, P.R.A.; Huseynov, F.; Kariyawasam, K.K.G.K.D.; Middleton, C.R. Bridge monitoring. In Innovative Bridge DESIGN Handbook; Butterworth-Heinemann: Oxford, UK, 2022; pp. 893–932.He, Z.; Li, W.; Salehi, H.; Zhang, H.; Zhou, H.; Jiao, P. Integrated structural health monitoring in bridge engineering. Autom. Constr. 2022, 136, 104168. [CrossRef]

Zinno, R.; Artese, S.; Clausi, G.; Magarò, F.; Meduri, S.; Miceli, A.; Venneri, A. Structural health monitoring (SHM). In The Internet of Things for Smart Urban Ecosystems; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; pp. 225–249.

Ghazal, T.M.; Hasan, M.K.; Alshurideh, M.T.; Alzoubi, H.M.; Ahmad, M.; Akbar, S.S.; Akour, I.A. IoT for smart cities: Machine learning approaches in smart healthcare—A review. Fut. Internet 2021, 13, 218. [CrossRef]

Lv, Z.; Qiao, L.; Kumar Singh, A.; Wang, Q. AI-empowered IoT security for smart cities. ACM Trans. Internet Technol. 2021, 21,

1–21. [CrossRef]

Alavi, A.; Feng, M.; Jiao, P.; Sharif-Khodaei, Z. (Eds.) The Rise of Smart Cities: Advanced Structural Sensing and Monitoring Systems; Butterworth-Heinemann: Oxford, UK, 2022.

Greco, F.; Lonetti, P.; Zinno, R. An analytical delamination model for laminated plates including bridging effects Int. J. Solids Struct. 2002, 39, 2435–2463. [CrossRef]

Artese, S.; Lerma García, J.L.; Zagari, G.; Zinno, R. The survey, the representation and the structural modeling of a dated bridge. In Proceedings of the 8th International Congress on Archaeology, Computer Graphics, Cultural Heritage and Innovation, Valencia, Spain, 5–7 September 2016; pp. 162–168.

Khosravikia, F.; Potter, A.; Prakhov, V.; Zalachoris, G.; Cheng, T.; Tiwari, A.; Frohlich, C. Seismic Vulnerability and Post-Event Actions for Texas Bridge Infrastructure; No. FHWA/TX-18/0-6916-1; Center for Transportation Research at the University of Texas at Austin: Austin, TX, USA, 2018.

Moss, R.; Matthews, S. In-service structural monitoring a state-of-the-art review. Struct. Eng. 1995, 73, 23–31.

Sohn, H.; Farrar, C.R.; Hemez, F.M.; Shunk, D.D.; Stinemates, D.W.; Nadler, B.R. A Review of Structural Health Monitoring Literature: 1996–2001; Los Alamos National Laboratory Report No. LA-13976-MS; Alamos National Laboratory: Los Alamos, New Mexico, 2004.

Artese, S.; Achilli, V.; Zinno, R. Monitoring of bridges by a laser pointer: Dynamic measurement of support rotations and elastic line displacements: Methodology and first test. Sensors 2018, 18, 338. [CrossRef]

Downloads

Published

30.08.2023

How to Cite

Ravindra B. Shendge. (2023). Modern Approaches in SHM: Combining AI, UAVs, and 3D Printing for Bridge Monitoring. International Journal of Intelligent Systems and Applications in Engineering, 11(11s), 901 –. Retrieved from https://www.ijisae.org/index.php/IJISAE/article/view/7786

Issue

Section

Research Article