Analysis of Walkability on Mixed-Use Urban Streets Utilizing Space Syntax Methodologies: A Case Study of Field Marshal Cariappa Road, Tumakuru
Keywords:
Walkability, Space Syntax, Urban Planning, Pedestrian EnvironmentAbstract
Walkability, a critical element in urban design and planning, is defined by multiple factors that contribute to a safe and enjoyable pedestrian experience. This paper investigates the application of Space Syntax tools to assess walkability on a mixed-use street within an Indian urban context, a domain where such sophisticated spatial analysis has been underutilized despite its potential for informing urban planning (Zhu et al., 2019). The research employs a quantitative methodology to evaluate pedestrian environments, utilizing Space Syntax metrics such as connectivity and integration, which are critical for understanding how urban layouts influence accessibility and human mobility (Morales et al., 2017) (Nag et al., 2022). This approach aims to develop a quantitative measure to assess pedestrian environments, thereby aiding the prioritization of investments in infrastructure that supports active transportation (Anapakula & Eranki, 2021). A spatial examination of walkability along Field Marshal Cariappa Road in Tumkur city of Karnataka, was conducted utilizing Space Syntax methodologies. This research contributes by illuminating the current pedestrian conditions along Field Marshal Cariappa Road, pinpointing areas that necessitate improvement, and thereby informing the development of more pedestrian-centric urban environments within Tumkur.
Downloads
References
Anapakula, K. B., & Eranki, G. A. (2021). Developing an index to evaluate the quality of pedestrian environment: Case study application in an Indian metro. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 11, 100406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2021.100406
Apritasari, Y. D. (2020). EVALUATION FOR USER’S SATISFACTION ON PATHWAY AND STREET FURNITURE FACILITIES IN THAMRIN-SUDIRMAN AREA. International Journal of Built Environment and Scientific Research, 4(1), 61. https://doi.org/10.24853/ijbesr.4.1.61-72
Asadi-Shekari, Z., Moeinaddini, M., & Shah, M. Z. (2014). Pedestrian safety index for evaluating street facilities in urban areas. Safety Science, 74, 1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2014.11.014
Askarizad, R., & He, J. (2022). Perception of Spatial Legibility and Its Association with Human Mobility Patterns: An Empirical Assessment of the Historical Districts in Rasht, Iran. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(22), 15258. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192215258
Baek, J., & Lim, L. (2023). Unveiling pedestrian injury risk factors through integration of urban contexts using multimodal deep learning. Sustainable Cities and Society, 101, 105168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2023.105168
Chen, X., Shi, Z., & Hu, Y. (2025). The Walkability Evaluation and Optimization Strategies of Metro Station Areas Taking Shanghai as an Example. Buildings, 15(10), 1746. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15101746
Fenghour, A., Hamouda, A., & Benyahia, L. (2022). ENCLOSURE OF OUTDOOR SPACES IN A RESIDENTIAL ENVIRONMENT BETWEEN VISIBILITY AND ACCESSIBILITY. Arquitetura Revista, 18(1), 99. https://doi.org/10.4013/arq.2022.181.06
Foti, F. (2014). A Behavioral Framework for Measuring Walkability and its Impact on Home Values and Residential Location Choices. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7x81p8bw.pdf
Froehlich, J. E., Saugstad, M., Saha, M., & Johnson, M. S. (2022). Towards Mapping and Assessing Sidewalk Accessibility Across Sociocultural and Geographic Contexts. arXiv (Cornell University). https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2207.13626
Jabbari, M., Fonseca, F. P. da, Smith, G., Conticelli, E., Tondelli, S., Ribeiro, P., Ahmadi, Z., Papageorgiou, G., & Ramos, R. A. R. (2023). The Pedestrian Network Concept: A Systematic Literature Review. Journal of Urban Mobility, 3, 100051. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urbmob.2023.100051
Job, R. F. S. (2020). Policies and Interventions to Provide Safety for Pedestrians and Overcome the Systematic Biases Underlying the Failures. Frontiers in Sustainable Cities, 2. https://doi.org/10.3389/frsc.2020.00030
Kaur, H., Singh, P., Bivina, G. R., & Nawani, A. (2021). Qualitative Evaluation of Pedestrian Facilities using the PLOS Model. IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science, 775(1), 12004. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/775/1/012004
Litman, T. (2003). Economic Value of Walkability. Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1828(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.3141/1828-01
Marangão, G. H. de F., Magagnin, R. C., Fontes, M. S. G. de C., & Azambuja, M. dos A. (2022). Methodologies for measuring the quality of urban infrastructure for pedestrian mobility: A systematic literature review. Revista Nacional de Gerenciamento de Cidades, 10(78). https://doi.org/10.17271/23188472107820223284
Mehta, V. (2008). Walkable streets: pedestrian behavior, perceptions and attitudes. Journal of Urbanism International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability, 1(3), 217. https://doi.org/10.1080/17549170802529480
Morales, J., Flacke, J., Morales, J., & Zevenbergen, J. A. (2017). Mapping Urban Accessibility in Data Scarce Contexts Using Space Syntax and Location-Based Methods. Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy, 12(2), 205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12061-017-9239-1
Nag, D., Sen, J., & Goswami, A. K. (2022). Measuring Connectivity of Pedestrian Street Networks in the Built Environment for Walking: A Space-Syntax Approach. Transportation in Developing Economies, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40890-022-00170-7
Patil, M., Majumdar, B. B., & Sahu, P. K. (2021). Evaluating Pedestrian Crash-Prone Locations to Formulate Policy Interventions for Improved Safety and Walkability at Sidewalks and Crosswalks. Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2675(9), 675. https://doi.org/10.1177/03611981211004127
Quijada-Alarcón, J., Rodríguez-Rodríguez, R., Maylin, A., Adames, M., Zeballos, J., Icaza, A., & Harris, A. (2025). Assessing Pedestrian Network Continuity: Insights from Panama City’s Context. Urban Science, 9(3), 58. https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci9030058
Rukmana, D. V., Maemunah, S., Candrarahayu, A. M., Digambiro, R., Manurung, R. A., & Rahandhi, R. (2023). Integration Facilities for Pedestrians in Train Station Area. Jurnal Manajemen Transportasi & Logistik (JMTRANSLOG), 9(3), 263. https://doi.org/10.54324/j.mtl.v9i3.1073
Thombre, L., & Kapshe, C. (2020). Understanding Contribution of Physical Accessibility in Perceptual Conviviality of Public Open Spaces using Analytical Hierarchy Process. International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering, 9(4), 2798. https://doi.org/10.35940/ijitee.d1671.029420
Zhang, L., Ye, Y., Zeng, W., & Chiaradia, A. (2019). A Systematic Measurement of Street Quality through Multi-Sourced Urban Data: A Human-Oriented Analysis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(10), 1782. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16101782
Zhu, Q., & Wang, J. (2005). Multidimensional design for urban space based on the syntactical modeling. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE, 6045, 604533. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.651846
Zhu, W., Hua, Y., & Dogan, T. (2019). Evaluating Street Quality for Walkability from 3D Models. IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science, 294(1), 12025. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/294/1/012025
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
All papers should be submitted electronically. All submitted manuscripts must be original work that is not under submission at another journal or under consideration for publication in another form, such as a monograph or chapter of a book. Authors of submitted papers are obligated not to submit their paper for publication elsewhere until an editorial decision is rendered on their submission. Further, authors of accepted papers are prohibited from publishing the results in other publications that appear before the paper is published in the Journal unless they receive approval for doing so from the Editor-In-Chief.
IJISAE open access articles are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. This license lets the audience to give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made and if they remix, transform, or build upon the material, they must distribute contributions under the same license as the original.
