Explainability and Robustness Trade-offs: Ensuring Safety and Fairness in Large-Scale AI Deployments
Keywords:
Explainability, Robustness, Fairness, Safety, Trustworthy AI, Ethical GovernanceAbstract
The rapid deployment of large-scale artificial intelligence (AI) systems has raised significant concerns about their explainability, robustness, safety, and fairness. As these models grow in complexity, ensuring that their decisions remain interpretable and trustworthy becomes increasingly challenging. Explainability enables transparency by revealing the reasoning behind model predictions, fostering user trust and regulatory compliance. However, efforts to make models more explainable often introduce trade-offs with robustness reducing resilience to adversarial inputs, data shifts, or unexpected scenarios. This tension highlights a critical need for balanced design strategies that safeguard both interpretability and performance integrity. Robustness, on the other hand, enhances system reliability under diverse conditions but may obscure internal decision mechanisms, leading to potential opacity and biases. Achieving harmony between these dimensions requires hybrid approaches that integrate interpretable architectures, causal reasoning, and uncertainty quantification. Furthermore, embedding fairness metrics into both training and evaluation pipelines is essential to mitigate systemic biases that can compromise social equity and safety. This paper examines the interdependencies between explainability and robustness, explores existing methodologies for reconciling these objectives, and proposes a multidisciplinary framework emphasizing human-centered, ethical AI governance. Ultimately, achieving scalable and fair AI demands continual alignment between algorithmic transparency, technical resilience, and societal accountability.
Downloads
References
Tjoa, E.; Guan, C. A survey on explainable artificial intelligence (XAI): Toward medical XAI. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 2020, 32(11), 4793–4813.
Sheu, R.-K.; Pardeshi, M.S. A survey on medical explainable AI (XAI): Recent progress, explainability approaches, human interaction and scoring systems. Sensors, 2022, 22(20), 8068.
Hulsen, T.; Friedecký, D.; Renz, H.; Melis, E.; Vermeersch, P.; Fernandez-Calle, P. From big data to better patient outcomes. Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, 2022, 61(4), 580–586.
Celi, L.A.; Cellini, J.; Charpignon, M.-L.; Dee, E.C.; Dernoncourt, F.; Eber, R.; Mitchell, W.G.; Moukheiber, L.; Schirmer, J.; Situ, J. Sources of bias in artificial intelligence that perpetuate healthcare disparities—A global review. PLOS Digital Health, 2022, 1(3), e0000022.
Albahri, A.S.; Duhaim, A.M.; Fadhel, M.A.; Alnoor, A.; Baqer, N.S.; Alzubaidi, L.; Deveci, M. A systematic review of trustworthy and explainable artificial intelligence in healthcare: Assessment of quality, bias risk, and data fusion. Information Fusion, 2022, 96, 156–191.
Hulsen, T.; Friedecký, D.; Renz, H.; Melis, E.; Vermeersch, P.; Fernandez-Calle, P. From big data to better patient outcomes. Clin. Chem. Lab. Med. (CCLM) 2022, 61, 580–586.
Celi, L.A.; Cellini, J.; Charpignon, M.-L.; Dee, E.C.; Dernoncourt, F.; Eber, R.; Mitchell, W.G.; Moukheiber, L.; Schirmer, J.; Situ, J. Sources of bias in artificial intelligence that perpetuate healthcare disparities—A global review. PLoS Digit. Health 2022, 1, e0000022.
Sheu, R.-K.; Pardeshi, M.S. A Survey on Medical Explainable AI (XAI): Recent Progress, Explainability Approach, Human Interaction and Scoring System. Sensors 2022, 22, 8068.
Tonekaboni, S.; Joshi, S.; McCradden, M.D.; Goldenberg, A. What clinicians want: Contextualizing explainable machine learning for clinical end use. npj Digital Medicine, 2021, 4, 120.
Holzinger, A.; Carrington, A.; Müller, H. Measuring the quality of explanations: The system causability scale (SCS). Medical Image Analysis, 2022, 75, 102027.
Ghassemi, M.; Naumann, T.; Schulam, P.; Beam, A.L.; Chen, I.Y.; Ranganath, R. A review of challenges and opportunities in machine learning for health. EBioMedicine, 2021, 62, 103558.
Tjoa, E.; Guan, C. A survey on explainable artificial intelligence (XAI): Toward medical XAI. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. Learn. Syst., 2020, 32, 4793–4813.
Holzinger, A.; Langs, G.; Denk, H.; Zatloukal, K.; Müller, H. Causability and explainability of artificial intelligence in medicine. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Data Min. Knowl. Discov., 2020, 10, e1312.
Gunning, D.; Aha, D. DARPA’s explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) program. AI Magazine, 2019, 40, 44–58. (Widely cited foundational XAI reference used in healthcare literature)
Arrieta, A.B.; Díaz-Rodríguez, N.; Del Ser, J.; Bennetot, A.; Tabik, S.; Barbado, A.; Herrera, F. Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI. Information Fusion, 2020, 58, 82–115.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
All papers should be submitted electronically. All submitted manuscripts must be original work that is not under submission at another journal or under consideration for publication in another form, such as a monograph or chapter of a book. Authors of submitted papers are obligated not to submit their paper for publication elsewhere until an editorial decision is rendered on their submission. Further, authors of accepted papers are prohibited from publishing the results in other publications that appear before the paper is published in the Journal unless they receive approval for doing so from the Editor-In-Chief.
IJISAE open access articles are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. This license lets the audience to give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made and if they remix, transform, or build upon the material, they must distribute contributions under the same license as the original.
