AI-Powered Threat Intelligence Platforms for National Cybersecurity Resilience

Authors

  • Chiranjeevi Kunaparaju

Keywords:

Artificial intelligence; Cyber threat intelligence; National cybersecurity resilience; Machine learning; Natural language processing; Knowledge graphs; Threat intelligence platforms; Critical infrastructure security

Abstract

Artificial intelligence driven cyber threat intelligence platforms have emerged as a critical capability for strengthening national cybersecurity resilience in an increasingly complex and hostile digital environment. Traditional threat intelligence approaches are often limited by manual analysis, fragmented data sources, and delayed response, which constrain their effectiveness at national scale. This study examines how AI-powered threat intelligence platforms enhance national cybersecurity resilience by enabling automated data ingestion, intelligent threat detection, contextual correlation, and proactive defense across critical infrastructure sectors. Drawing on recent advances in machine learning, natural language processing, knowledge graphs, and large language models, the paper analyzes the architectural components, operational functions, and intelligence sharing mechanisms that underpin modern AI-enabled threat intelligence systems. The study further evaluates the role of standardized frameworks and platforms such as STIX, MISP, and MITRE ATT&CK in supporting interoperability, coordinated response, and cross-organizational intelligence exchange. Performance benefits, including improved detection accuracy, reduced incident response time, and enhanced situational awareness, are discussed alongside governance, privacy, and implementation challenges at the national level. The findings highlight that AIpowered threat intelligence platforms are not merely technical tools but strategic assets that support proactive risk management, informed decision-making, and sustained national cybersecurity resilience.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ashibani, Y., & Mahmoud, Q. H. (2017). Cyber physical systems security: Analysis, challenges and solutions. Computers & Security, 68, 81-97.

Bronk, C., & Conklin, W. A. (2022). Who’s in charge and how does it work? US cybersecurity of critical infrastructure. Journal of Cyber Policy, 7(2), 155-174.

de Melo e Silva, A., Costa Gondim,

J. J., de Oliveira Albuquerque, R., & García Villalba, L. J. (2020). A methodology to evaluate standards and platforms within cyber threat intelligence. Future Internet, 12(6), 108.

Exploring the opportunities and limitations of current Threat Intelligence Platforms About ENISA. (2017). https://www.enisa.europa.eu/sites

/default/files/publications/WP201

7%20O.3.1.2u3%20%20Limits%20of%20TISPs.pdf

Gao, P., Liu, X., Choi, E., Ma, S., Yang, X., Ji, Z., ... & Song, D. (2022). Threatkg: A threat knowledge graph for automated open-source cyber threat intelligence gathering and management. arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.10388.

Homan, D., Shiel, I., & Thorpe, C. (2019, June). A new network model for cyber threat intelligence sharing using blockchain technology. In 2019 10th IFIP International Conference on New Technologies, Mobility and Security (NTMS) (pp. 1-6). IEEE.

Jo, H., Lee, Y., & Shin, S. (2022). Vulcan: Automatic extraction and analysis of cyber threat intelligence from unstructured text. Computers & Security, 120, 102763.

Johnson, C. (2016). Guide to Cyber Threat Information Sharing. NIST Special Publication, 800-150.

Ramsdale, A., Shiaeles, S., & Kolokotronis, N. (2020). A comparative analysis of cyberthreat intelligence sources, formats and languages. Electronics, 9(5), 824.

Saputra, M. I. (2023). Literature

Review Network Security. Jurnal Jaringan Komputer dan Keamanan, 4(03), 30-34.

Sarhan, I., & Spruit, M. (2021). Open-cykg: An open cyber threat intelligence knowledge graph. Knowledge-based systems, 233, 107524.

Shaukat, K., Luo, S., Varadharajan, V., Hameed, I. A., & Xu, M. (2020). A survey on machine learning techniques for cyber security in the last decade. IEEE access, 8, 222310-222354.

Shin, B., & Lowry, P. B. (2020). A review and theoretical explanation of the ‘Cyberthreat-Intelligence (CTI) capability’that needs to be fostered in information security practitioners and how this can be accomplished. Computers & Security, 92, 101761.

STIX Version 2.1. (2022, November 16). OASIS Open. https://www.oasisopen.org/standard/6426/

STIXTM Best Practices Guide Version 1.0.0. (2022).

https://www.cisa.gov/sites/default

/files/2022-12/stix-bp-v1.0.0.pdf

Stojkovski, B., Lenzini, G., Koenig, V., & Rivas, S. (2021, December).

What’s in a Cyber Threat

Intelligence sharing platform? A mixed-methods user experience investigation of MISP. In Proceedings of the 37th Annual Computer Security Applications Conference (pp. 385-398).

Uppuluri, V. (2019). The Role of

Natural Language Processing (NLP) in Business Intelligence (BI) for Clinical Decision Support.

ISCSITR-INTERNATIONAL

JOURNAL OF BUSINESS INTELLIGENCE (ISCSITR-IJBI), 1(2), 1-21.

Strom, B. E., Applebaum, A., Miller, D. P., Nickels, K. C., Pennington, A. G., & Thomas, C. B. (2018). Mitre att&ck: Design and philosophy. In Technical report. The MITRE Corporation.

Sullivan, C., & Burger, E. (2017). “In the public interest”: The privacy implications of international business-to-business sharing of cyber-threat intelligence. Computer law & security review, 33(1), 14-29.

Taorui Guan, “Evidence-Based

Patent Damages,” 28 Journal of Intellectual Property Law (2020), 161.

Wagner, T. D., Mahbub, K., Palomar, E., & Abdallah, A. E. (2019). Cyber threat intelligence sharing: Survey and research directions. Computers & Security, 87, 101589.

Wang, X., He, S., Xiong, Z., Wei, X., Jiang, Z., Chen, S., & Jiang, J. (2022, May). Aptner: A specific dataset for ner missions in cyber threat intelligence field. In 2022 IEEE 25th international conference on computer supported cooperative work in design (CSCWD) (pp. 1233-1238). IEEE.

Yang, W., & Lam, K. Y. (2019, December). Automated cyber threat intelligence reports classification for early warning of cyber attacks in next generation SOC. In International Conference on Information and Communications Security (pp. 145-164). Cham: Springer International Publishing.

Downloads

Published

30.12.2024

How to Cite

Chiranjeevi Kunaparaju. (2024). AI-Powered Threat Intelligence Platforms for National Cybersecurity Resilience. International Journal of Intelligent Systems and Applications in Engineering, 12(23s), 4247–4258. Retrieved from https://www.ijisae.org/index.php/IJISAE/article/view/8216

Issue

Section

Research Article