Quantum-Accelerated Portfolio Rebalancing for Multi-Custodian Wealth Platforms: A Cost-Benefit Framework

Authors

  • Sathya Prabu Rajagopal, Anshika Jain

Keywords:

Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm, Multi-Custodian Portfolio Rebalancing, Quadratic Unconstrained Binary Optimization, Hybrid Quantum-Classical Computing, Tax-Loss Harvesting, Wealth Management Optimization

Abstract

Wealth management is marred by systemic fragmentation. Investors today distribute assets across multiple custodians, each running its own ledger, its own tax lot system, and its own compliance engine, yet portfolio rebalancing tools still treat every account as if it exists in isolation. The result is predictable: missed tax opportunities, duplicated risk exposure, and wash-sale violations that span custodial boundaries; no single system is watching. The article introduces the Multi-Custodian Hybrid Optimization Theory (MCHOT), a framework that treats the entire household as a single optimization target rather than a collection of disconnected accounts. The global rebalancing task is formulated as a Quadratic Unconstrained Binary Optimization (QUBO) problem, encoding budget constraints, portfolio covariance, expected returns, tax-lot granularity, and cross-custodian compliance penalties into one energy minimization objective. A Hybrid Quantum-Classical (HQC) pipeline then solves this objective using the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA), followed by a deterministic compliance-repair stage before any order is routed. Beyond the technical architecture, MCHOT establishes a practical economic rationale for hybrid quantum deployment, identifying the exact portfolio size and custodian density at which quantum coordination becomes financially justified. The proposed approach highlights how quantum-powered global coordination can minimize combinatorial fragmentation while adhering to rigorous regulatory requirements. The implications reach beyond computation: this framework reframes rebalancing as a household-wide coordination discipline with long-term consequences for scalable, tax-aware wealth management.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

McKinsey & Company, "Quantum technology monitor," 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/mckinsey/business%20functions/mckinsey%20digital/our%20insight s/the%20year%20of%20quantum%20from%20concept%20to%20reality%20in%202025/quantum-monito r-2025.pdf

HSBC, "HSBC demonstrates world’s first-known quantum-enabled algorithmic trading with IBM," 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.hsbc.com/news-and-views/news/media-releases/2025/hsbc-demonstrates-worlds-first-known -quantum-enabled-algorithmic-trading-with-ibm

Quantum AI, "Quantum Computing in 2026 Bold Predictions," 2025. [Online]. Available: https://quantumai.co.com/quantum-computing-in-2026-bold-predictions/

Henning Soller, "Quantum communication and computing: Elevating the banking sector," McKinsey & Company, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/financial-services/our-insights/quantum-communication-and-compu ting-elevating-the-banking-sector

Edward Farhi, et al., "A Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm," arXiv, 2014. Available: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1411.4028

D-Wave Systems, "Multiverse Computing: Optimizing Financial Portfolios with Quantum Computing," 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.dwavequantum.com/media/5qahck2o/

Andrew Lucas, "Ising formulations of many NP problems," arXiv, 2014. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1302.5843

Vojtech Havlicek, et al., "Supervised learning with quantum-enhanced feature spaces," arXiv, 2018. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1804.11326

Renata Mansini, et al., "Twenty years of linear programming-based portfolio optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, 2014. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0377221713007194

Samuel Mugel, et al., "Dynamic Portfolio Optimization with Real Datasets Using Quantum Processors and Quantum-Inspired Tensor Networks," arXiv, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2007.00017

Mikhail Beketov et al., "Robo Advisors: Quantitative Methods Inside the Robots," Journal of Asset Management, 2018. [Online]. Available: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1057/s41260-018-0092-9 [12] David Blanchett and Paul Kaplan, "Alpha, beta, and now… gamma," The Journal of Retirement, 2013. [Online]. Available: https://www.morningstar.com/content/dam/marketing/shared/research/foundational/677796-AlphaBetaGa mma.pdf

Ryan Babbush, et al., "Focus beyond Quadratic Speedups for Error-Corrected Quantum Advantage," PRX Quantum, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://journals.aps.org/prxquantum/pdf/10.1103/PRXQuantum.2.010103

John Preskill, "Quantum Computing in the NISQ era and beyond," arXiv, 2018. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1801.00862

Raghu Gollapudi, "Telemetry-Driven Predictive Failure Models for High-Scale Financial Databases," Journal of Computational Analysis and Applications, 2025. Available: https://www.eudoxuspress.com/index.php/pub/article/view/4835/3620

Downloads

Published

10.06.2026

How to Cite

Sathya Prabu Rajagopal. (2026). Quantum-Accelerated Portfolio Rebalancing for Multi-Custodian Wealth Platforms: A Cost-Benefit Framework . International Journal of Intelligent Systems and Applications in Engineering, 14(1s), 1311 –. Retrieved from https://www.ijisae.org/index.php/IJISAE/article/view/8353

Issue

Section

Research Article