Predictive Failure Detection in Enterprise Data Pipelines Using Machine Learning and Data Observability Metrics
Keywords:
Data Observability, Predictive Analytics, DataOps, AI Engineering, Machine Learning, Data Pipeline Monitoring, Failure Prediction, Anomaly Detection.Abstract
Enterprise data pipelines serve as the backbone of modern analytics, business intelligence, and data-driven decision-making systems. As organizations increasingly rely on real-time and large-scale data processing, pipeline failures can result in delayed insights, data inconsistencies, operational disruptions, and significant financial losses. Traditional monitoring approaches primarily focus on reactive detection mechanisms, identifying issues only after failures occur. Recent advancements in Data Observability and Machine Learning have enabled organizations to move toward proactive failure prediction and prevention. This research proposes a Predictive Failure Detection Framework that integrates machine learning techniques with data observability metrics to identify potential failures before they impact business operations. The framework continuously analyzes operational indicators such as pipeline latency, data freshness, schema changes, throughput, error rates, and resource utilization to predict anomalies and failure events. Experimental evaluation demonstrates that predictive analytics significantly improves failure detection accuracy, reduces downtime, and enhances pipeline reliability. The proposed framework contributes to the development of intelligent, resilient, and self-monitoring data engineering ecosystems.
Downloads
References
R. Kimball and M. Ross, The Data Warehouse Toolkit: The Definitive Guide to Dimensional Modeling, 3rd ed. Hoboken, NJ, USA: Wiley, 2013.
A. Labrinidis and H. V. Jagadish, “Challenges and opportunities with big data,” Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment, vol. 5, no. 12, pp. 2032–2033, Aug. 2012.
P. Mell and T. Grance, “The NIST definition of cloud computing,” NIST Special Publication 800-145, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, USA, 2011.
M. Armbrust, A. Fox, R. Griffith, et al., “A view of cloud computing,” Communications of the ACM, vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 50–58, Apr. 2010.
J. Kreps, N. Narkhede, and J. Rao, “Kafka: A Distributed Messaging System for Log Processing,” in Proc. NetDB, Athens, Greece, 2011.
M. Zaharia, R. S. Xin, P. Wendell, T. Das, M. Armbrust, et al., “Apache Spark: A Unified Engine for Big Data Processing,” Communications of the ACM, vol. 59, no. 11, pp. 56–65, Nov. 2016.
S. Russell and P. Norvig, Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach, 4th ed. Pearson, 2021.
Y. LeCun, Y. Bengio, and G. Hinton, “Deep Learning,” Nature, vol. 521, no. 7553, pp. 436–444, 2015.
C. Ebert, G. Gallardo, J. Hernantes, and N. Serrano, “DevOps,” IEEE Software, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 94–100, 2016.
B. Burns, B. Grant, D. Oppenheimer, E. Brewer, and J. Wilkes, “Borg, Omega, and Kubernetes,” ACM Queue, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 70–93, 2016.
B. Burns, B. Grant, D. Oppenheimer, E. Brewer, and J. Wilkes, “Borg, Omega, and Kubernetes,” ACM Queue, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 70–93, 2016.
X. Li, H. Zhang, and Y. Wang, “Machine Learning-Based Failure Prediction in Distributed Data Systems,” Future Generation Computer Systems, vol. 121, pp. 88–101, 2021.
J. Kreps, N. Narkhede, and J. Rao, “Kafka: A Distributed Messaging System for Log Processing,” in Proc. NetDB, 2011.
M. Zaharia, R. S. Xin, P. Wendell, T. Das, M. Armbrust, et al., “Apache Spark: A Unified Engine for Big Data Processing,” Communications of the ACM, vol. 59, no. 11, pp. 56–65, 2016.
A. Verma, L. Pedrosa, M. Korupolu, D. Oppenheimer, E. Tune, and J. Wilkes, “Large-Scale Cluster Management at Google with Borg,” in Proceedings of the Tenth European Conference on Computer Systems (EuroSys), 2015.
B. Burns, B. Grant, D. Oppenheimer, E. Brewer, and J. Wilkes, “Borg, Omega, and Kubernetes,” ACM Queue, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 70–93, 2016.
J. Dean and L. A. Barroso, “The Tail at Scale,” Communications of the ACM, vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 74–80, 2013.
Y. LeCun, Y. Bengio, and G. Hinton, “Deep Learning,” Nature, vol. 521, no. 7553, pp. 436–444, 2015.
D. Sculley, G. Holt, D. Golovin, E. Davydov, T. Phillips, et al., “Hidden Technical Debt in Machine Learning Systems,” in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), vol. 28, 2015.
Y. Chen, J. Wu, and L. Zhao, “AI-Driven Predictive Monitoring for DataOps Platforms,” IEEE Access, vol. 12, pp. 45871–45889, 2024.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
All papers should be submitted electronically. All submitted manuscripts must be original work that is not under submission at another journal or under consideration for publication in another form, such as a monograph or chapter of a book. Authors of submitted papers are obligated not to submit their paper for publication elsewhere until an editorial decision is rendered on their submission. Further, authors of accepted papers are prohibited from publishing the results in other publications that appear before the paper is published in the Journal unless they receive approval for doing so from the Editor-In-Chief.
IJISAE open access articles are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. This license lets the audience to give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made and if they remix, transform, or build upon the material, they must distribute contributions under the same license as the original.
