Bridging the Digital Accessibility Gap: How Legacy-to-Modern Front-End Transformation Improves Usability, Compliance, and Inclusive Access in Enterprise Financial Platforms

Authors

  • Mohammed Sayerwala

Keywords:

Digital Accessibility, WCAG, Ada Compliance, React, Legacy Modernization, Inclusive Design, Assistive Technology, Enterprise Financial Platforms

Abstract

Enterprise financial applications have evolved from digital accessibility being an afterthought or a legal compliance issue to a purposeful design consideration․ This evolution is spurred by compliance‚ litigation risk‚ and the growing recognition that inaccessible digital experiences create systemic barriers to useful involvement in financial systems for millions․ This article examines the relationship between legacy front-end architectures and accessibility deficits․ In particular‚ it explores the technical challenges that jQuery-based‚ server-rendered interfaces create for assistive technology (AT) users and people with adaptive needs․ It additionally outlines new accessibility capabilities of the migration to component architectures based on React․ These include intrinsic semantics‚ a convention for ARIA attributes‚ responsive reflowing‚ and conditional rendering․ Additional topics discussed in the article beyond the interface are supported session handoffs and modularity for multi-user workflows․ The authors also discuss regulations such as the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines‚ including how shift-left testing and automation can be used for compliance testing․ Towards the end of the paper‚ the authors discuss the implications of inclusive design for enterprise financial contexts.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

W3C Web Accessibility Initiative, "Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.1," W3C Recommendation, 2018. [Online]. Available: https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG21/

G. Brajnik, Y. Yesilada, and S. Harper, "The expertise effect on web accessibility evaluation methods," Hum.-Comput. Interact., vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 246-283, 2011. DOI: 10.1080/07370024.2011.601670. [Online]. Available: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/07370024.2011.601670

M. Vigo, J. Brown, and V. Conway, "Benchmarking web accessibility evaluation tools: Measuring the harm of sole reliance on automated tests," in Proc. 10th Int. Cross-Disciplinary Conf. Web Accessibility (W4A), 2013, art. 1. DOI: 10.1145/2461121.2461124. [Online]. Available: https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2461121.2461124

Y. Yesilada, G. Brajnik, M. Vigo, and S. Harper, "Understanding web accessibility and its drivers," in Proc. 9th Int. Cross-Disciplinary Conf. Web Accessibility (W4A), 2012, art. 1. DOI: 10.1145/2207016.2207027. [Online]. Available: https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2207016.2207027

M. Cooper, D. Sloan, B. Kelly, and S. Lewthwaite, "A challenge to web accessibility metrics and guidelines: Putting people and processes first," in Proc. 9th Int. Cross-Disciplinary Conf. Web Accessibility (W4A), 2012, art. 20. DOI: 10.1145/2207016.2207028. [Online]. Available: https://researchportal.bath.ac.uk/en/publications/a-challenge-to-web-accessibility-metrics-and-guidelines-putting-p/

C. Stephanidis, G. Salvendy et al., "Seven HCI grand challenges," Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Interact., vol. 35, no. 14, pp. 1229-1269, 2019. DOI: 10.1080/10447318.2019.1619259. [Online]. Available: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10447318.2019.1619259

C. Power, A. Freire, H. Petrie, and D. Swallow, "Guidelines are only half of the story: Accessibility problems encountered by blind users on the web," in Proc. SIGCHI Conf. Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI), 2012, pp. 433-442. DOI: 10.1145/2207676.2207736. [Online]. Available: https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2207676.2207736

J. Abascal, M. Arrue, and X. Valencia, "Tools for web accessibility evaluation," in Web Accessibility, 2nd ed., Y. Yesilada and S. Harper, Eds. Springer, 2019, pp. 479-503. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4471-7440-0_26. [Online]. Available: https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-1-4471-7440-0_26

A. Vollenwyder, G. H. Iten, F. Bruhlmann, K. Opwis, and E. D. Mekler, "Salient beliefs influencing the intention to consider web accessibility," Comput. Hum. Behav., vol. 92, pp. 352-360, 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2018.11.016. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S074756321830551X

C. Pahl and P. Jamshidi, "Microservices: A systematic mapping study," in Proc. 6th Int. Conf. Cloud Computing and Services Science (CLOSER), 2016, pp. 137-146. [Online]. Available: https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5220/0005785501370146

A. Balalaie, A. Heydarnoori, and P. Jamshidi, "Microservices architecture enables DevOps: Migration to a cloud-native architecture," IEEE Software, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 42-52, 2016. DOI: 10.1109/MS.2016.64. [Online]. Available: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7436659

D. Taibi, V. Lenarduzzi, and C. Pahl, "Architectural patterns for microservices: A systematic mapping study," in Proc. 8th Int. Conf. CLOSER, 2018, pp. 221-232. [Online]. Available: https://www.scitepress.org/Papers/2018/67983/

M. Waseem, P. Liang, M. Shahin, A. Ahmad, and A. R. Nasab, "On the nature of issues in five open source microservices systems," in Proc. 25th Int. Conf. EASE, 2021, pp. 201-210. DOI: 10.1145/3463274.3463337. [Online]. Available: https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3463274.3463337

N. A. Ernst, S. Bellomo, I. Ozkaya, R. L. Nord, and I. Gorton, "Measure it? Manage it? Ignore it? Software practitioners and technical debt," in Proc. 10th Joint Meeting ESEC/FSE, 2015, pp. 50-60. DOI: 10.1145/2786805.2786848. [Online]. Available: https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2786805.2786848

T. Cerny, M. J. Donahoo, and M. Trnka, "Contextual understanding of microservice architecture: Current and future directions," ACM SIGAPP Appl. Comput. Rev., vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 29-45, 2018. DOI: 10.1145/3183628.3183631. [Online]. Available: https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3183628.3183631

Downloads

Published

30.06.2026

How to Cite

Mohammed Sayerwala. (2026). Bridging the Digital Accessibility Gap: How Legacy-to-Modern Front-End Transformation Improves Usability, Compliance, and Inclusive Access in Enterprise Financial Platforms. International Journal of Intelligent Systems and Applications in Engineering, 14(1s), 1773–1780. Retrieved from https://www.ijisae.org/index.php/IJISAE/article/view/8416

Issue

Vol. 14 No. 1s (2026)

Section

Research Article

License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

All papers should be submitted electronically. All submitted manuscripts must be original work that is not under submission at another journal or under consideration for publication in another form, such as a monograph or chapter of a book. Authors of submitted papers are obligated not to submit their paper for publication elsewhere until an editorial decision is rendered on their submission. Further, authors of accepted papers are prohibited from publishing the results in other publications that appear before the paper is published in the Journal unless they receive approval for doing so from the Editor-In-Chief.

IJISAE open access articles are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. This license lets the audience to give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made and if they remix, transform, or build upon the material, they must distribute contributions under the same license as the original.