Self-Healing Data Pipelines: AI-Driven Automation in Financial Data Operations
Keywords:
self-healing pipelines, anomaly detection, financial data architecture, root cause analysis, ETL reliability, AIOpsAbstract
Net asset value calculation, treasury reporting, and risk aggregation all run on data pipelines that are expected to work every day, on time, without exception. In practice they don’t always. Upstream feeds arrive late. Source schemas change without warning. Null rates spike. Replication channels back up under load. Static-threshold monitoring catches the obvious cases and misses the rest, and it treats a market-wide price swing the same way it treats a corrupted feedvas an alert to be triaged manually. This paper proposes a self-healing pipeline architecture built around four separated, auditable stages: telemetry collection, machine learning-driven anomaly detection, dependency-aware diagnosis, and governed remediation. The detection logic draws directly from production price-validation practicevchecking a security’s movement against correlated peers rather than judging it alone because that distinction is what separates a real anomaly from ordinary market behavior. Evaluation combines synthetic fault injection with replay of historical incidents, and reports verified production evidence: dependency-aware filtering of NAV pricing exceptions reduced false-positive review volume by roughly 95%, and eliminating redundant source-side updates cut change-data-capture replication lag from hours to seconds. Detection and recovery speed are characterized qualitatively rather than with an invented figure, since no verified time-to-detect or time-to-recover statistic exists for the reference production system. The paper closes with a look at generative-AI-assisted remediation reporting and regulatory-aware automation as next steps.
Downloads
References
A. Challa and M. R. Konatham, "Self-Healing CI/CD Pipelines with Feedback-Loop Automation," International Journal of Intelligent Systems and Applications in Engineering (IJISAE), vol. 12, no. 23s, pp. 3217–3229, 2024.
V. Chandola, A. Banerjee, and V. Kumar, "Anomaly Detection: A Survey," ACM Computing Surveys, vol. 41, no. 3, Art. 15, Jul. 2009, doi: 10.1145/1541880.1541882.
J. Gama, I. Žliobaitė, A. Bifet, M. Pechenizkiy, and A. Bouchachia, "A Survey on Concept Drift Adaptation," ACM Computing Surveys, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 1–37, 2014.
A. H. Fawzy, K. Wassif, and H. Moussa, "Framework for Automatic Detection of Anomalies in DevOps," Journal of King Saud University – Computer and Information Sciences, vol. 35, pp. 8–19, 2023.
F. T. Liu, K. M. Ting, and Z.-H. Zhou, "Isolation Forest," in Proc. 2008 8th IEEE Int’l Conf. on Data Mining, 2008, pp. 413–422, doi: 10.1109/ICDM.2008.17.
A. Hrusto, E. Engström, and P. Runeson, "Optimization of Anomaly Detection in a Microservice System Through Continuous Feedback from Development," in Proc. 10th IEEE/ACM Int’l Workshop on Software Engineering for Systems-of-Systems and Software Ecosystems, 2022, pp. 13–20, doi: 10.1145/3528229.3529382.
S. S. Aljameel et al., "An Anomaly Detection Model for Oil and Gas Pipelines Using Machine Learning," Computation, vol. 10, no. 8, p. 138, Aug. 2022, doi: 10.3390/computation10080138.
M. R. Sokkula, "Integrating Blockchain and AI for Data Encryption and Secure ETL Pipelines," IJISAE, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 395–406, 2025.
M. R. Sokkula, "The Role of AI in Strengthening Cybersecurity for Data Pipelines and ETL Systems," IJISAE, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 357–368, 2025.
J. O. Kephart and D. M. Chess, "The Vision of Autonomic Computing," IEEE Computer, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 41–50, Jan. 2003, doi: 10.1109/MC.2003.1160055.
A. Capizzi, S. Distefano, L. J. P. Araújo, M. Mazzara, M. Ahmad, and E. Bobrov, "Anomaly Detection in DevOps Toolchain," in Software Engineering Aspects of Continuous Development and New Paradigms of Software Production and Deployment (DEVOPS 2019), Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 12055, Springer, 2020, pp. 37–51, doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-39306-9_3.
C. Bansal, S. Renganathan, A. Asudani, et al., "DeCaf: Diagnosing and Triaging Performance Issues in Large-Scale Cloud Services," in Proc. ACM/IEEE 42nd Int’l Conf. on Software Engineering, 2020, pp. 201–210.
J. Soldani and A. Brogi, "Anomaly Detection and Failure Root Cause Analysis in (Micro) Service-Based Cloud Applications: A Survey," ACM Computing Surveys, vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 1–39, 2022, doi: 10.1145/3501297.
Á. Brandón, M. Solé, A. Huélamo, D. Solans, M. S. Pérez, and V. Muntés-Mulero, "Graph-Based Root Cause Analysis for Service-Oriented and Microservice Architectures," Journal of Systems and Software, vol. 159, 110432, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2019.110432.
A. Ikram, S. Chakraborty, S. Mitra, S. Saini, S. Bagchi, and M. Kocaoglu, "Root Cause Analysis of Failures in Microservices Through Causal Discovery," Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 35, pp. 31158–31170, 2022.
M. Li, Z. Li, K. Yin, X. Nie, W. Zhang, K. Sui, and D. Pei, "Causal Inference-Based Root Cause Analysis for Online Service Systems with Intervention Recognition," in Proc. 28th ACM SIGKDD Conf. on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 2022, pp. 3230–3240.
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, Principles for Effective Risk Data Aggregation and Risk Reporting (BCBS 239), Bank for International Settlements, Jan. 2013.
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, "Regulation Systems Compliance and Integrity," 17 C.F.R. §242.1000–1007, Release No. 34-73639, Nov. 2014.
P. Cichonski, T. Millar, T. Grance, and K. Scarfone, "Computer Security Incident Handling Guide," NIST Special Publication 800-61 Rev. 2, Aug. 2012, doi: 10.6028/NIST.SP.800-61r2.
C. L. Kappani, "Leveraging AI-Driven Predictive Analytics for Effective Program Management in Retail Supply Chains: A Program Manager’s Perspective," IJISAE, vol. 14, no. 1s, pp. 295–303, 2026.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
All papers should be submitted electronically. All submitted manuscripts must be original work that is not under submission at another journal or under consideration for publication in another form, such as a monograph or chapter of a book. Authors of submitted papers are obligated not to submit their paper for publication elsewhere until an editorial decision is rendered on their submission. Further, authors of accepted papers are prohibited from publishing the results in other publications that appear before the paper is published in the Journal unless they receive approval for doing so from the Editor-In-Chief.
IJISAE open access articles are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. This license lets the audience to give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made and if they remix, transform, or build upon the material, they must distribute contributions under the same license as the original.


