From Reactive ITSM to Predictive Incident Prevention Using AI

Authors

  • Nayan Kumar Sureshbhai Patel

Keywords:

AIOps, anomaly detection, enterprise resilience, IT service management, predictive incident prevention

Abstract

Traditional IT service management (ITSM) relies on a reactive operating model in which operations teams respond to failures after end users are already affected. This approach is increasingly insufficient in cloud-native, distributed, and always-on enterprise environments where the cost of delayed incident response includes downtime, reputational damage, and compounding operational waste. This article examines how artificial intelligence transforms ITSM from reactive response to predictive incident prevention through four core capabilities: anomaly detection, failure prediction, risk scoring, and proactive automation. Drawing on a structured review of 22 sources spanning AIOps, machine learning operations, enterprise integration, and sustainable computing, the article proposes a unified framework that connects AI-driven prevention capabilities to the six architectural patterns, microservices decomposition, event-driven integration, containerization, orchestration, caching, and observability, that are required to sustain them in production. The article presents three tables and three figures that structure the reactive-to-predictive transition as a maturity model, detail the AI capability stack, and map architectural contributions to sustainability outcomes. Findings indicate that predictive ITSM delivers measurable resilience improvements and sustainability co-benefits when implemented within an architecturally disciplined platform. The article concludes with governance requirements for automated decision-making and directions for future empirical research.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

A. Adadi and M. Berrada, "Peeking inside the black-box: A survey on explainable artificial intelligence (XAI)," IEEE Access, vol. 6, pp. 52138–52160, 2018. Available: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2870052

B. Beyer, C. Jones, J. Petoff, and N. R. Murphy, Site Reliability Engineering: How Google Runs Production Systems, O'Reilly Media, Sebastopol, CA, 2016. Available: https://repo.darmajaya.ac.id/4636/1/Site%20Reliability%20Engineering_%20How%20Google%20Runs%20Production%20Systems%20%28%20PDFDrive%20%29.pdf

B. Burns, B. Grant, D. Oppenheimer, E. Brewer, and J. Wilkes, "Borg, Omega, and Kubernetes," Communications of the ACM, vol. 59, no. 5, pp. 50–57, 2016. Available: https://dl.acm.org/doi/fullHtml/10.1145/2890784

M. Chen, X. Zheng, J. Lloyd, M. I. Jordan, and E. Brewer, "Failure diagnosis using decision trees," in Proc. IEEE International Conference on Autonomic Computing (ICAC), New York, 2004, pp. 36–43. Available: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICAC.2004.1301345

Y. Dang, Q. Lin, and P. Huang, "AIOps: Real-world challenges and research innovations," in Proc. 41st IEEE/ACM International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering in Practice (ICSE-SEIP), Montreal, 2019, pp. 4–5. Available: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSE-Companion.2019.00023

P. He, J. Zhu, Z. Zheng, and M. R. Lyu, "Drain: An online log parsing approach with fixed depth tree," in Proc. IEEE International Conference on Web Services (ICWS), Honolulu, 2017, pp. 33–40. Available: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICWS.2017.13

S. He, J. Zhu, P. He, and M. R. Lyu, "Survey on real-world performance bugs," ACM Computing Surveys, vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 1–35, 2021. Available: https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.1145/3460345

G. Hohpe and B. Woolf, Enterprise Integration Patterns: Designing, Building, and Deploying Messaging Solutions, Addison-Wesley Professional, Boston, MA, 2003. Available: https://dl.acm.org/doi/book/10.5555/940308

A. Jobin, M. Ienca, and E. Vayena, "The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines," Nature Machine Intelligence, vol. 1, pp. 389–399, 2019. Available: https://www.nature.com/articles/s42256-019-0088-2

M. Kleppmann, Designing Data-Intensive Applications: The Big Ideas Behind Reliable, Scalable, and Maintainable Systems, O'Reilly Media, Sebastopol, CA, 2017. Available: https://www.oreilly.com/library/view/designing-data-intensive-applications/9781491903063/

D. Kreuzberger, N. Kühl, and S. Hirschl, "Machine learning operations (MLOps): Overview, definition, and architecture," IEEE Access, vol. 11, pp. 31866–31879, 2023. Available: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3262138

J. Lewis and M. Fowler, "Microservices: A definition of this new architectural term," MartinFowler.com, 2014. Available: https://martinfowler.com/articles/microservices.html

L. Li, X. Zhang, X. Zhao, H. Zhang, Y. Kang, P. Zhao, B. Qiao et al., "Fighting the fog of war: Automated incident detection for cloud systems," in Proc. USENIX Annual Technical Conference (USENIX ATC 21), 2021, pp. 131–146. Available: https://www.usenix.org/conference/atc21/presentation/li-liqun

N. Mehrabi, F. Morstatter, N. Saxena, K. Lerman, and A. Galstyan, "A survey on bias and fairness in machine learning," ACM Computing Surveys, vol. 54, no. 6, pp. 1–35, 2021. Available: https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.1145/3457607

D. Merkel, "Docker: Lightweight Linux containers for consistent development and deployment," Linux Journal, vol. 2014, no. 239, pp. 2, 2014. Available: https://www.seltzer.com/margo/teaching/CS508.19/papers/merkel14.pdf

P. Notaro, J. Cardoso, and M. Gerndt, "A survey of AIOps methods for failure management," ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 1–45, 2021. Available: https://dl.acm.org/doi/full/10.1145/3483424

R. Schwartz, J. Dodge, N. A. Smith, and O. Etzioni, "Green AI," Communications of the ACM, vol. 63, no. 12, pp. 54–63, 2020. Available: https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3381831

D. Sculley, G. Holt, D. Golovin, E. Davydov, T. Phillips, D. Ebner, V. Chaudhary, M. Young, J.-F. Crespo, and D. Dennison, "Hidden technical debt in machine learning systems," Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 28, 2015. Available: https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper_files/paper/2015/hash/86df7dcfd896fcaf2674f757a2463eba-Abstract.html

J. Soldani and A. Brogi, "Anomaly detection and failure root cause analysis in (micro) service-based cloud applications: A survey," ACM Computing Surveys, vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 1–39, 2022. Available: https://dl.acm.org/doi/full/10.1145/3501297

E. Strubell, A. Ganesh, and A. McCallum, "Energy and policy considerations for deep learning in NLP," in Proc. 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL), Florence, 2019, pp. 3645–3650. Available: https://aclanthology.org/P19-1355/

R. Syed, S. Suriadi, M. Adams, W. Bandara, S. J. J. Leemans, C. Ouyang, A. H. M. ter Hofstede, I. van de Weerd, M. T. Wynn, and H. A. Reijers, "Robotic process automation: Contemporary themes and challenges," Computers in Industry, vol. 115, pp. 103162, 2020. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2019.103162

M. Zaharia, A. Chen, A. Davidson, A. Ghodsi, S. A. Hong, A. Konwinski, S. Murching, T. Nykodym, P. Ogilvie, M. Parkhe, F. Xie, and C. Zumar, "Accelerating the machine learning lifecycle with MLflow," IEEE Data Engineering Bulletin, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 39–45, 2018. Available: http://sites.computer.org/debull/A18dec/A18DEC-CD.pdf#page=41

Q. Yu, N. Zhao, M. Li, Z. Li, H. Wang, W. Zhang, K. Sui and D. Pei, "A survey on intelligent management of alerts and incidents in IT services," Journal of Network and Computer Applications, vol. 224, 2024. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnca.2024.103842

Mohammad Saiful Islam, Mohamed Sami Rakha, William Pourmajidi, Janakan Sivaloganathan, John Steinbacher, and Andriy Miranskyy, "Anomaly detection in large-scale cloud systems: An industry case and dataset," in Proc. 47th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering in Practice (ICSE-SEIP), Ottawa, Canada, 2025, pp. 377–388. Available: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSE-SEIP66354.2025.00039

Shenglin Zhang, Sibo Xia, Wenzhao Fan, Binpeng Shi, Xiao Xiong, Zhenyu Zhong, Minghua Ma, Yongqian Sun, and Dan Pei, "Failure diagnosis in microservice systems: A comprehensive survey and analysis," ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 1–55, 2025. Available: https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3715005

Sumith Thalary and Anvesh Katipelly, "Cloud-native design for event-driven systems: Where software architecture decisions meet DevOps reality," International Journal of AI, BigData, Computational and Management Studies, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 202–211, June 2024. Available: http://ijaibdcms.org/index.php/ijaibdcms/article/view/509

Juneyd Arafat, Faria Tasmin, Saurabh Poudel, and Abdullah Tareq, "Next-generation event-driven architectures: Performance, scalability, and intelligent orchestration across messaging frameworks," arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.04404, October 2025. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.04404

Sagar Chaudhari, "Event-driven architecture: Building responsive enterprise systems," International Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 3063–3073, February 2025. Available: https://doi.org/10.32628/CSEIT251112323

Downloads

Published

31.08.2026

How to Cite

Nayan Kumar Sureshbhai Patel. (2026). From Reactive ITSM to Predictive Incident Prevention Using AI. International Journal of Intelligent Systems and Applications in Engineering, 14(1s), 2367 –. Retrieved from https://www.ijisae.org/index.php/IJISAE/article/view/8541

Issue

Section

Research Article