Power Aware Simulation Challenges and Solutions in Semiconductor ICs Design Verification

Authors

  • Nilesh Patel

Keywords:

Power-aware verification, Low-power design, Unified Power Format, Multi-voltage domains, Formal verification, Design automation

Abstract

Power-aware design verification has become a critical aspect of modern integrated circuit (IC) development, especially in the context of low-power, high-performance applications such as mobile devices, IoT systems, and automotive electronics. With the increasing demand for energy efficiency, design engineers must ensure that power intent is accurately captured, implemented, and verified across various design abstraction levels. However, verifying power-aware designs introduces several unique challenges. These include ensuring correct functionality across multiple power domains, managing power state transitions, verifying retention and isolation strategies, and detecting unintended power-induced bugs such as data corruption or signal contention. One of the major challenges is the lack of a unified methodology to validate both functional and power intent cohesively. Traditional verification flows often fall short in identifying subtle power-related issues due to the complexity of power-aware features like Multi-Voltage Domains (MVD), Power Gating, and Dynamic Voltage and Frequency Scaling (DVFS). Moreover, integrating power-aware simulations with functional verification environments requires careful coordination between Unified Power Format (UPF) or Common Power Format (CPF) specifications and RTL design. To address these issues, several solutions have been proposed and adopted in the industry. These include the use of formal verification techniques for exhaustive state-space analysis, dynamic simulation with power-aware testbenches, and automated rule-checking tools that validate UPF/CPF semantics against RTL. Assertion-based verification (ABV) and low-power aware test scenarios also play a crucial role in ensuring coverage of power-related corner cases. Additionally, emulation and hardware-assisted verification provide scalable solutions for large SoCs where simulation falls short. In conclusion, power-aware design verification demands a multi-faceted approach that combines formal, dynamic, and static techniques. The evolution of EDA tools and methodologies tailored to power-aware verification is key to enabling robust, low-power IC designs in today’s competitive semiconductor landscape.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Khondkar, Progyna. Low-Power Design and Power-Aware Verification. Springer International Publishing, 2018.

Ravi, Srivaths. "Power-aware test: Challenges and solutions." In 2007 IEEE International Test Conference, pp. 1-10. IEEE, 2007.

Anantharaman, Boobalan, Arunkumar Narayanamurthy, and Design Engineer Staff. "Power Aware Verification Strategy for SoCs." (2013).

Prasad, Durgesh, Madhur Bhargava, Jitesh Bansal, and Chuck Seeley. "Debug Challenges in Low-Power Design and Verification." DVCon US (2015).

Srikantaiah, Shekhar, Aman Kansal, and Feng Zhao. "Energy aware consolidation for cloud computing." In USENIX HotPower'08: Workshop on Power Aware Computing and Systems at OSDI. 2008.

Bolla, Raffaele, Roberto Bruschi, Franco Davoli, and Flavio Cucchietti. "Energy efficiency in the future internet: a survey of existing approaches and trends in energy-aware fixed network infrastructures." IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials 13, no. 2 (2010): 223-244.

Yang, Tien-Ju, Yu-Hsin Chen, and Vivienne Sze. "Designing energy-efficient convolutional neural networks using energy-aware pruning." In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pp. 5687-5695. 2017.

Zhang, Qi, Lu Cheng, and Raouf Boutaba. "Cloud computing: state-of-the-art and research challenges." Journal of internet services and applications 1 (2010): 7-18.

Yaqoob, Ibrar, Ejaz Ahmed, Ibrahim Abaker Targio Hashem, Abdelmuttlib Ibrahim Abdalla Ahmed, Abdullah Gani, Muhammad Imran, and Mohsen Guizani. "Internet of things architecture: Recent advances, taxonomy, requirements, and open challenges." IEEE wireless communications 24, no. 3 (2017): 10-16.

Stojkoska, Biljana L. Risteska, and Kire V. Trivodaliev. "A review of Internet of Things for smart home: Challenges and solutions." Journal of cleaner production 140 (2017): 1454-1464.

Zeng, Yong, Rui Zhang, and Teng Joon Lim. "Wireless communications with unmanned aerial vehicles: Opportunities and challenges." IEEE Communications magazine 54, no. 5 (2016): 36-42.

Seshia, Sanjit A., Shiyan Hu, Wenchao Li, and Qi Zhu. "Design automation of cyber-physical systems: Challenges, advances, and opportunities." IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems 36, no. 9 (2016): 1421-1434.

Thangaramya, K., Kanagasabai Kulothungan, R. Logambigai, Munuswamy Selvi, Sannasi Ganapathy, and Arputharaj Kannan. "Energy aware cluster and neuro-fuzzy based routing algorithm for wireless sensor networks in IoT." Computer networks 151 (2019): 211-223.

Downloads

Published

26.03.2021

How to Cite

Nilesh Patel. (2021). Power Aware Simulation Challenges and Solutions in Semiconductor ICs Design Verification. International Journal of Intelligent Systems and Applications in Engineering, 9(1), 122–127. Retrieved from https://www.ijisae.org/index.php/IJISAE/article/view/7738

Issue

Section

Research Article